You are here:
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blog
  4. Continuing competence: meeting requirements is easier than you think

Continuing competence: meeting requirements is easier than you think

01 March 2017

Four months into continuing competence, some firms are introducing draconian, bureaucratic processes to comply under the new regime. And that means they are unnecessarily making a rod for their own back, says Melissa Hardee.


I am often asked by firms what they should they be doing to comply with continuing competence, and whether what they're doing already is right. My question in return is: are you doing anything differently, and why?

Lawyers tend to feel uncomfortable without rules and regulations to follow, and so, when the CPD regulations were repealed on 31 October 2016 and not replaced, many looked to the Solicitors Regulation Authority's continuing competence toolkit to fill what they saw as a regulatory void. But the toolkit is not a replacement: it is non-mandatory guidance only. If you've used the toolkit as your starting point, you may have made unnecessary work for yourself and your solicitors, and imposed unnecessary and burdensome bureaucracy. Do you now require, say, implemented quarterly reflections recorded in a prescribed format, or weekly recording of all activities that meet learning and development needs, or something similar?

What solicitors have, since the change on 1 November, is actually the same obligation they have always had: the obligation under principle 5 of the SRA Handbook to provide a proper standard of service to their clients. If firms were able to comply with principle 5 before 1 November, 2016, the removal of a requirement to do 16 hours of CPD a year should not have changed this.

Yes, the new declaration solicitors have to make to renew their practising certificate does say 'I have reflected on my practice and addressed any identified learning and development needs'. But that is all it says. How and when a solicitor reflects, and how and when they identify and address learning and development needs, is not prescribed. In fact, the SRA has gone to great lengths to stress that it is for the individual solicitor to determine. 'Continuing competence' is not actually a defined term – it is a term of art, a concept, a short-hand way of describing the responsibility solicitors bear individually under principle 5.

Let me use an analogy to explain what I mean. For years, I entered the cake-baking competition in my village show. Sometimes I would be given the recipe I had to use to make the cake; at other times, I wasn't given a recipe but could use whatever recipe I liked, provided that I produced a cake that met the specified judging standards for the show. It's the same with 'continuing competence': previously, the CPD regulations were the 'recipe' solicitors had to follow to ensure they were competent (though it is questionable whether 16 hours of CPD of any sort of itself ensured competence); from 1 November, 2016, however, solicitors are able to use whatever 'recipe' they want, provided that the 'recipe' achieves the required standards of competence – namely, the competencies in the SRA's competence statement, and a proper standard of service to their clients.

Rather than scrabbling around madly for new 'recipes', step back and consider what 'recipes' you already use in your firm that ensure your solicitors are – and remain – competent. Do you have, for instance, an appraisal process with pre-appraisal preparation; current awareness briefings or regular team meetings; personal development plans; post-transaction file reviews; training programmes for trainees / junior lawyers / senior lawyers / partners? Of course, some of the recipes might benefit from improvements – and now is also the time to think about that – but the reality is this: there is probably not much you need to do differently in order to ensure that your solicitors comply with Principle 5.

The Law Society's Professional Development Centre can help you create a personal development plan, capture all your learning in one place and record and assess yourself against the SRA competence statement. Sign up to our eLearning portal

Tags: CPD | training | education and training

About the author

Melissa Hardee is a solicitor, as well as a consultant at Hardee Consulting. She is a recognised expert in legal education and training, and its regulation.

  • Share this page:
Authors

Adam Johnson | Adele Edwin-Lamerton | Alex Barr | Alex Heshmaty | Alexandra Cardenas | Amanda Carpenter | Amanda Jardine Viner | Amy Heading | Andrew Kidd | Andy Harris | Anna Drozd | Annaliese Fiehn | Anne Waldron | Asif Afridi and Roseanne Russell | Bansi Desai | Barbara Whitehorne | Barry Wilkinson | Becky Baker | Ben Hollom | Bob Nightingale | Caroline Roddis | Caroline Sorbier | Catherine Dixon | Christina Blacklaws | Ciaran Fenton | David Gilroy | David Yeoward | Douglas McPherson | Dr Sylvie Delacroix | Duncan Wood | Eduardo Reyes | Elizabeth Rimmer | Emily Miller | Emma Maule | Gary Richards | Gary Rycroft | Graham Murphy | Hayley Stewart | Ignasi Guardans | James Castro Edwards | Jayne Willetts | Jeremy Miles | Jerry Garvey | Jessie Barwick | Joe Egan | Jonathan Andrews | Jonathan Fisher | Jonathan Smithers | Julian Hall | Julie Ashdown | Julie Nicholds | Justin Rourke | Karen Jackson | Kate Adam | Kayleigh Leonie | Keiley Ann Broadhead | Kerrie Fuller | Kevin Poulter | Larry Cattle | Laura Devine | Leah Glover and Julie Ashdown | LHS Solicitors | Lucy Parker | Mark Carver | Mark Leiser | Markus Coleman | Martin Barnes | Matthew Still | Meena Toor | Melissa Hardee | Neil Ford | Nick Denys | Nick Podd | Pearl Moses | Penny Owston | Peter Wright | Philippa Southwell | Preetha Gopalan | Rachel Brushfield | Ranjit Uppal | Richard Coulthard | Richard Heinrich | Richard Messingham | Richard Miller | Richard Roberts | Rita Oscar | Rob Cope | Robert Bourns | Robin Charrot | Rosy Rourke | Saida Bello | Sam De Silva | Sara Chandler | Sarah Austin | Sarah Crowe | Sarah Henchoz | Sarah Smith | Shereen Semnani | Sophia Adams Bhatti | Steve Deutsch | Steve Deutsche | Stuart Poole-Robb | Susan Kench | Suzanne Gallagher | Tom Ellen | Tony Roe Solicitors | Vanessa Friend

Tags

access to justice | anti-money laundering | apprenticeships | archive | artificial intelligence | Autumn Statement | bid process | brand | Brexit | British Bill of Rights | Budget | business | careers | centenary | charity | city | communication | Conservatives | conveyancing | court closures | court fees | courts | CPD | criminal legal aid | cyber security | David Cameron | development | Diversity Access Scheme | diversity and inclusion | education and training | elderly people | emotional resilience | employment law | equality | European Union | Excellence Awards | finance | George Osborne | human rights | human trafficking | immigration | in-house | International Womens Day | Investigatory Powers Bill | IT | Jeremy Corbyn | justice | knowledge management | Labour | law management | Law Society | leadership | legal aid | legal professional privilege | LGBT | Liberal Democrats | library | Liz Truss | Magna Carta | mass data retention | mediation | members | mention | mentoring | merger | modern slavery | morale | National Pro Bono Week | Parliament | party conferences | personal injury | Pii | politics | president | pro bono | productivity | professional indemnity insurance | represent | retweet | risk | rule of law | security | social media | social mobility | SRA | staff | strategy | stress | talent | tax | tax credits | team | technology | Theresa May | Time capture | training | Twitter | UKIP | value proposition | website | wellbeing | Westminster weekly update | wills