You are here:
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blog
  4. Making the legal system accessible to all - the Law Society’s vision for law and justice

Making the legal system accessible to all - the Law Society’s vision for law and justice

18 May 2017

Along with priorities for the rule of law and Brexit, access to justice represents the third pillar of our Vision for Law and Justice we launched on 5 May.


Access to justice is a fundamental requirement for the rule of law, by which people have their voice heard, exercise their rights, challenge discrimination, and hold decision makers to account. Promoting and protecting access to justice is a constant theme for the Law Society and a core value uniting our profession.

Reinstate legal aid for early advice

To ensure justice is accessible to those who need it, it is important that the next government reinstates legal aid for early advice, particularly in housing and family law. This was removed under the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act (LASPO) 2012.

Without free or subsidised early advice, relatively minor legal problems can escalate, creating health, social and financial problems, and placing additional pressure and cost on public services. For example, in housing law, an individual can only get housing advice under legal aid when a problem has become severe, such as serious disrepair of a property, or in cases of actual or threatened homelessness. If free early advice was available, this could resolve such issues before they worsen and become more costly for the individual - and for the public purse.  

A lack of early advice has also created problems in the family courts. When removing legal aid for the majority of private family matters, the government hoped to increase uptake in mediation so families could resolve their problems outside of court. However, the numbers of mediation assessments and cases have plummeted, whilst the numbers of litigants in person has risen dramatically – we believe part of the reason for this is because solicitors providing early, valuable advice were a significant source of referrals. 

The current situation is not sustainable and increases suffering to the detriment of society. We are keen to work with the next government in order to address this issue. 

Scrap moves to increase the small claims limit

The ability to obtain redress for injuries sustained due to the negligence of another is a fundamental principle of English law. We continue to strongly oppose the changes to personal injury reforms introduced by the previous government in the Prisons and Courts Bill. 

The Bill did not have time to finish its passage through parliament because of the general election. This does not mean that these reforms will go away as they can be revived under the new government. We are calling for the new government to reconsider proposals to increase the small claims limit, which would make it difficult for people to obtain effective and valuable advice, and to claim compensation for injuries they have suffered because of someone else’s fault. Again, the consequences will be increased cost to other public services.  

End the cross-examination of victims of domestic abuse

Over the last few years, the Law Society has worked relentlessly, in partnership with Rights of Women and other organisations, to highlight the problems of victims of domestic violence accessing justice in the family court. We welcome the provisions contained in the Prisons and Courts Bill to stop alleged perpetrators from cross-examining in person a witness who is the victim, or alleged victim, of domestic abuse, and we are determined to continue our work to see the reform implemented after the election.

Legal aid is often the only way someone can bring their case before the courts. In 2015, the House of Commons Justice Select Committee found that 39% of domestic violence victims could not provide the evidence (PDF 1MB) demanded by the Legal Aid Agency (LAA), so they were excluded from legal aid. This is why we are also calling for the new government to implement proposals to increase the flexibility of the rules determining whether a victim of domestic abuse can receive legal aid.

To keep up to date with what we are doing and how you can help, visit our General Election page. 

 

Tags: justice | access to justice | president | Brexit

About the author

Robert Bourns was the 172nd president of the Law Society. He is a senior partner at TLT Solicitors, where he specialises in employment law. Robert is one of five representatives for the City of London constituency, a member of the Law Society's Equality and Diversity Committee, and a member of the Regulatory Affairs Board Regulatory Processes Committee.
Follow TLT on Twitter 
Follow the Law Society president on Twitter

  • Share this page:
Authors

Adam Johnson | Adele Edwin-Lamerton | Alex Barr | Alex Heshmaty | Alexandra Cardenas | Amanda Carpenter | Amanda Jardine Viner | Amy Heading | Andrew Kidd | Andy Harris | Anna Drozd | Annaliese Fiehn | Anne Waldron | Asif Afridi and Roseanne Russell | Bansi Desai | Barbara Whitehorne | Barry Wilkinson | Becky Baker | Ben Hollom | Bob Nightingale | Caroline Roddis | Caroline Sorbier | Catherine Dixon | Christina Blacklaws | Ciaran Fenton | David Gilroy | David Yeoward | Douglas McPherson | Dr Sylvie Delacroix | Duncan Wood | Eduardo Reyes | Elizabeth Rimmer | Emily Miller | Emma Maule | Gary Richards | Gary Rycroft | Graham Murphy | Hayley Stewart | Ignasi Guardans | James Castro Edwards | Jayne Willetts | Jeremy Miles | Jerry Garvey | Jessie Barwick | Joe Egan | Jonathan Andrews | Jonathan Fisher | Jonathan Smithers | Julian Hall | Julie Ashdown | Julie Nicholds | Justin Rourke | Karen Jackson | Kate Adam | Kayleigh Leonie | Keiley Ann Broadhead | Kerrie Fuller | Kevin Poulter | Larry Cattle | Laura Devine | Leah Glover and Julie Ashdown | LHS Solicitors | Lucy Parker | Mark Carver | Mark Leiser | Markus Coleman | Martin Barnes | Matthew Still | Meena Toor | Melissa Hardee | Neil Ford | Nick Denys | Nick Podd | Pearl Moses | Penny Owston | Peter Wright | Philippa Southwell | Preetha Gopalan | Rachel Brushfield | Ranjit Uppal | Richard Coulthard | Richard Heinrich | Richard Messingham | Richard Miller | Richard Roberts | Rita Oscar | Rob Cope | Robert Bourns | Robin Charrot | Rosy Rourke | Saida Bello | Sam De Silva | Sara Chandler | Sarah Austin | Sarah Crowe | Sarah Henchoz | Sarah Smith | Shereen Semnani | Sophia Adams Bhatti | Steve Deutsch | Steve Deutsche | Stuart Poole-Robb | Susan Kench | Suzanne Gallagher | Tom Ellen | Tony Roe Solicitors | Vanessa Friend

Tags

access to justice | anti-money laundering | apprenticeships | archive | artificial intelligence | Autumn Statement | bid process | brand | Brexit | British Bill of Rights | Budget | business | careers | centenary | charity | city | communication | Conservatives | conveyancing | court closures | court fees | courts | CPD | criminal legal aid | cyber security | David Cameron | development | Diversity Access Scheme | diversity and inclusion | education and training | elderly people | emotional resilience | employment law | equality | European Union | Excellence Awards | finance | George Osborne | human rights | human trafficking | immigration | in-house | International Womens Day | Investigatory Powers Bill | IT | Jeremy Corbyn | justice | knowledge management | Labour | law management | Law Society | leadership | legal aid | legal professional privilege | LGBT | Liberal Democrats | library | Liz Truss | Magna Carta | mass data retention | mediation | members | mention | mentoring | merger | modern slavery | morale | National Pro Bono Week | Parliament | party conferences | personal injury | Pii | politics | president | pro bono | productivity | professional indemnity insurance | represent | retweet | risk | rule of law | security | social media | social mobility | SRA | staff | strategy | stress | talent | tax | tax credits | team | technology | Theresa May | Time capture | training | Twitter | UKIP | value proposition | website | wellbeing | Westminster weekly update | wills