You are here:
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Press releases
  4. Employment Law Review

Employment Law Review

23 November 2011

Employment Law Review

The Government today announced the latest instalment of its Employment Law Review beginning with a two consultation papers that deal with the thorny issues of collective bargaining and the notoriously complex TUPE arrangements.

Also released today was the long awaited Government response to its major consultation paper 'Resolving Workplace Disputes' dealing with Employment Tribunal procedures . The next six months will see a number of related policy initiatives and consultations representing the most fundamental review of employment law in decades.

Headline developments announced today include:

  • The introduction in April 2012 of an increased qualifying period of 2 years for unfair dismissal
  • Reform of TUPE arrangements including the end of gold plating and the removal of professional services from scope
  • A reduction in the current redundancy consultation period from 90 days to possibly 60, 45 or 30 days following consultation
  • A fundamental review of Employment Tribunal Procedure led by Lord Justice Underhill accompanied by extensive rule changes in relation to costs, witness statements and the composition of the Tribunal bench.
  • Consultation on fees for access to the Employment Tribunal
  • Consultation on the introduction of a system of 'protected conversations' between employers and employees to offset constructive dismissal claims
  • Reform of regulation and policy in relation to sickness absence, the national minimum wage, the Agency Workers Directive and the operation of the legislation in respect of whistle blowers

A Law Society spokesperson said: “These are far reaching and wide ranging proposals that have the potential to change the employment law landscape significantly. They all require careful and considered thought and an open channel between the Government, business and employee representative groups.

“The Law Society will be looking particularly closely at the proposed changes to employment tribunals and what they will mean for access to justice”.