You are here:
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Press releases
  4. Law Society response to Autumn Statement

Law Society response to Autumn Statement

29 November 2011

Law Society response to Autumn Statement

Credit Easing

Law Society chief executive Desmond Hudson says:

“The Law Society welcomes credit easing measures detailed in today's Autumn Statement as they will benefit many high street law firms that have struggled to obtain credit in the current economic climate.

“If the measures achieve a 1 per cent drop in lending rates to small businesses, as detailed in Mr Osborne's speech today, then this will increase the supply of finance to many small and medium sized firms.”

Immigration

“We're fully behind the Government's encouragement to businesses of all sizes to adopt an export mentality, but at the same time its own approach to immigration is hampering successful firms' ability to employ highly talented individuals who can support their export drive. This isn't the time to be giving the impression that the UK is in any way unwelcoming to global business.”

Employment

“The Law Society welcomes any simplification of procedures, but not at the expense of clarity.”

(See commentary below for more detail on employment measures).

Ends

Please contact Graham Capper, Law Society press office for more details on 020 7320 5811

Commentary

Employment tribunal fees - The Government will shortly publish a consultation on the introduction of fees for anyone wishing to take a claim to an employment tribunal.

  • We will provide a thorough response to this consultation but our immediate concern is that fees (if deemed appropriate) are proportional and do not represent an obstacle for access to justice, especially for those of low means.

 

Compromise agreements - The Government will develop a model agreement for use by smaller businesses, consult on a legislative change to enable compromise agreements to cover all existing and future claims, and rename agreements as 'settlement agreements'.

  • We particularly welcome the decision to address the issues that we highlighted so strongly to the Government earlier this year on Section 147 Equality Act & Compromise Agreements. Clarity could not come sooner for the benefit of employers and practitioners.

Financial penalties - The Government will introduce a provision for employment tribunals to levy a financial penalty on employers found to have breached employment rights (payable to the Exchequer), but will allow judges the discretion about whether to exercise this power to ensure that employers are not penalised for inadvertent errors.

  • For threats to be not worth making, any sanction would need to be an adequate deterrent in all cases, and not just the relatively few occasions when the issue will be pursued.

Mediation - The Government will work with industry and key stakeholders to change attitudes to mediation and embed it as an accepted part of the dispute resolution process. As a first step, the Government will explore with large businesses in the retail sector how they might share their mediation expertise with smaller businesses in their supply chain. The Government will also pilot local mediation networks for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

  • We are to begin discussions with BIS next week on the role of mediation in employment

Employment tribunal Rules of Procedure - Mr Justice Underhill will lead a fundamental review of the employment tribunal Rules of Procedure. In the meantime, the Government will change the rules on witness statements and expenses, cost and deposit orders and judges sitting alone in unfair dismissal cases.

  • Simplicity is ideal but should not be at the expense of due process and substantive rights. We keenly await and will feed into Mr Justice Underhill's review. Angharad Harris (Chair, Employment Law Committee- Law Society) has been invited to join the working party.

Employment tribunal claims - The Government will require all potential claimants to submit their employment tribunal claim to the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) so that early conciliation can take place.

  • We welcome measures to try and reduce unnecessary litigation but this must be accompanied by appropriate funding for ACAS to carry out any new pre-claim role properly and effectively. If this does not materialise, it could have the effect of strengthening the resolve for litigation.

Agency Workers Directive - The Government will examine the paperwork obligations of the Agency Worker Regulations in 18 months' time to ensure that the practical arrangements for employers are as simple as possible.

  • The Law Society is generally supportive but this is conditional on the maintenance of adequate protections for agency workers being maintained.