How changes to accounting dates could lead to…
Andy Poole, from Law Society partner Armstrong Watson, explains how the proposed basis period reform could lead to higher tax bills for law firms.
We responded to an HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) consultation about the proposal to require large businesses to notify HMRC where they have adopted an uncertain tax treatment.
This consultation is about a proposed measure that would require large businesses to notify HMRC where they have adopted an uncertain tax treatment.
The consultation states that an uncertain tax treatment is one where the business believes that HMRC may not agree with their interpretation of the legislation, case law, or guidance.
Our response argues that the proposed measure should be reconsidered, and explains our three main concerns with the measure as it is currently proposed.
The proposed measure effectively:
All of this means that the measure, which goes beyond international law and accounting comparators, is incompatible with the rule of law, imposes an excessive and unreasonable compliance burden on taxpayers, and risks unintended negative consequences.
Counter-productively, the proposed measure could dis-incentivise taxpayers to seek advice and solicitors to offer it, which would run counter to the rule of law.
There are serious questions as to what solicitors' role and liability would be in giving advice on the proposed measure, if it's implemented into law.
Larger law firms may also need to consider whether they would qualify as large businesses for the purpose of the proposed measure, such that they would fall within the scope of the proposed notification requirements.
The consultation closed on 27 August 2020.
The government originally hoped to introduce legislation which would apply the measure to returns filed after April 2021.
That timescale may have been affected by disruption caused by the pandemic.