Volunteer guidelines on offering pro bono advice…
DLA Piper is coordinating offers of pro bono assistance for Afghan applicants with referrals and has shared guidelines for any immigration solicitors who want to volunteer through its hub.
Together with the Collective Campaign for Peace (COCAP – a network of peace and human rights organisations in Nepal), and with the assistance of its member firm Stevens & Bolton LLP, we've submitted a Universal Periodic Review (UPR) report on Nepal to the UN Human Rights Council.
We've also published a factsheet summarising the findings of that report.
The current constitution of Nepal, which came into force in September 2015 and establishes a federal system, gives rise to concerns about government interference with the regulation and oversight of non-governmental organisations (NGOs).
In addition, draft legislation has been proposed which would create further obstacles for local and international NGOs. In particular:
This legislation would hinder the effectiveness of NGOs and prevent them from speaking out against government policies and practices, as well as against human rights violations that are directly or indirectly attributable to state authorities.
Other legislation has already come into force since 2018 that increases government control over civil society and curtails civil liberties in Nepal.
For example, the Passport Bill permits the government to issue instructions to prevent passports from being issued to particular individuals.
The Nepal Special Service Bill increases the powers of surveillance of intelligence services, including powers to intercept audio and audio-visual conversations. This puts the security of lawyers and human rights defenders at risk and could interfere with lawyer-client confidentiality.
As well as the increased restrictions on NGOs in Nepal, there has been an increase in threats against lawyers and human rights defenders (HRDs), and other efforts to prevent them from carrying out their work.
The general lack of trust in law enforcement agencies among lawyers and HRDs has worsened because the law enforcement agencies have failed to adequately investigate these attacks.
Those who file complaints against state agents are especially at risk of violence and intimidation. There is a particularly high risk for female lawyers and HRDs, who in addition to threats, face defamation and social stigma for defending victims (especially victims of gender-based violence).
The offenders in such cases are rarely brought to justice and state authorities often fail to provide adequate protection to lawyers and HRDs.