You are here:
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blog
  4. Workers' rights without enforcement are meaningless

Workers' rights without enforcement are meaningless

10 February 2017

With cases of exploitation thrusting UK employment law into the spotlight, Nick Denys looks at how the system can be made fairer for all.

 Reading time: 2 minutes

Growing concerns around the ‘gig economy’, zero-hour contracts and other non-standard working arrangements have placed UK employment law under scrutiny in recent years. Research from Citizens Advice suggests that one in 10 people are bogusly defined as self-employed, meaning they lose out on holiday and sick pay, plus the right to be paid the national minimum wage. It also means loses of £314 million a year for the exchequer and puts responsible businesses at a competitive disadvantage to those willing to bend or break the rules.

In a move to combat exploitation, the government recently launched a £1.7 million advertising campaign to encourage workers to check they are being paid at least the minimum wage. A lack of awareness and clarity around workers’ rights is certainly an issue, but there's a greater problem at the heart of UK employment law: when faced with what can seem a daunting, complex and time-consuming legal route to justice, many workers simply don’t feel able to improve their situation.

In our employment legislative framework the obligation lies with the individual to challenge mistreatment. If an employee feels confident enough to do so, they must enter into a legal process with an uncertain outcome and run the risk of employer reprisals, including being blacklisted. It’s hardly surprising that so few under payment and unpaid wages actions have been brought.

Mauled in the press and slammed by MPs, Sports Direct’s reprehensible treatment of employees became well known. Yet the retailer’s working practices were uncovered during an Competition Commission investigation into the retailer’s part acquisition of competitor. It was this examination of a commercial transaction that brought the wrongdoing to light, rather than the actions of an exploited employee.

A review of adult social care by the National Audit Office found that up to 220,000 care workers in England were paid less than the minimum wage. HMRC found that 50 per cent of care sector providers were paid less than legal minimum. Despite this evidence, only six care providers have been identified and back pay provided to just 202 workers.

In the Law Society’s evidence to the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) Committee inquiry into the future of work and the rights of workers, we urged it to consider placing the onus on bosses to prove compliance with employment standards. Shifting this relatively small responsibility to employers could be an important step in ensuring protection for workers and creating a fairer system for everyone.

Tags: business | modern slavery | employment law

About the author

Nick Denys is the policy adviser who leads on employment and family law matters at the Law Society.

  • Share this page:

Adam Johnson | Adele Edwin-Lamerton | Alex Barr | Alex Heshmaty | Alexandra Cardenas | Amy Heading | Andrew Kidd | Andy Harris | Anna Drozd | Annaliese Fiehn | Anne Waldron | Asif Afridi and Roseanne Russell | Bansi Desai | Barbara Whitehorne | Barry Wilkinson | Ben Hollom | Bob Nightingale | Caroline Roddis | Caroline Sorbier | Catherine Dixon | Ciaran Fenton | David Gilroy | David Yeoward | Douglas McPherson | Dr Sylvie Delacroix | Duncan Wood | Elizabeth Rimmer | Emily Miller | Emma Maule | Gary Richards | Gary Rycroft | Graham Murphy | Hayley Stewart | Ignasi Guardans | Jayne Willetts | Jeremy Miles | Jerry Garvey | Jessie Barwick | Jonathan Smithers | Julian Hall | Julie Ashdown | Julie Nicholds | Karen Jackson | Kate Adam | Kayleigh Leonie | Keiley Ann Broadhead | Kerrie Fuller | Kevin Poulter | Larry Cattle | Laura Devine | Leah Glover and Julie Ashdown | LHS Solicitors | Mark Carver | Mark Leiser | Markus Coleman | Martin Barnes | Matthew Still | Meena Toor | Melissa Hardee | Nick Denys | Nick Podd | Pearl Moses | Peter Wright | Philippa Southwell | Preetha Gopalan | Rachel Brushfield | Ranjit Uppal | Richard Coulthard | Richard Heinrich | Richard Messingham | Richard Miller | Richard Roberts | Rita Oscar | Rob Cope | Robert Bourns | Robin Charrot | Rosy Rourke | Sara Chandler | Sarah Austin | Sarah Crowe | Sarah Henchoz | Sarah Smith | Shereen Semnani | Sophia Adams Bhatti | Steve Deutsch | Steve Deutsche | Stuart Poole-Robb | Susan Kench | Suzanne Gallagher | Tom Ellen | Tony Roe Solicitors | Vanessa Friend


access to justice | anti-money laundering | apprenticeships | archive | artificial intelligence | Autumn Statement | bid process | brand | Brexit | British Bill of Rights | Budget | business | careers | centenary | charity | city | communication | Conservatives | conveyancing | court closures | court fees | courts | CPD | criminal legal aid | cyber security | David Cameron | development | Diversity Access Scheme | diversity and inclusion | education and training | elderly people | emotional resilience | employment law | equality | European Union | Excellence Awards | finance | George Osborne | human rights | human trafficking | immigration | in-house | International Womens Day | Investigatory Powers Bill | IT | Jeremy Corbyn | justice | knowledge management | Labour | law management | Law Society | leadership | legal aid | legal professional privilege | LGBT | Liberal Democrats | library | Liz Truss | Magna Carta | mass data retention | mediation | members | mention | mentoring | merger | modern slavery | morale | National Pro Bono Week | Parliament | party conferences | personal injury | Pii | politics | president | pro bono | productivity | professional indemnity insurance | represent | retweet | risk | rule of law | security | social media | social mobility | SRA | staff | strategy | stress | talent | tax | tax credits | team | technology | Theresa May | Time capture | training | Twitter | UKIP | value proposition | website | wellbeing | Westminster weekly update | wills