The UK Immigration Rules are an important source of legal requirements for immigration control. Every year they inform hundreds of thousands of life-changing decisions, so they should be clear and easy to understand for everyone who uses them.
However, the rules have been widely criticised for being long, complex and difficult to use. At the end of 2018, they totalled 1,133 pages. Many applicants cannot understand them, and they can even confuse expert legal practitioners.
The Law Commission began a project to review the UK Immigration Rules in December 2017. It aimed to make the rules simpler and more accessible.
The consultation paper was published on 21 January 2019. It looked at:
- how the rules had developed
- how the rules could be reformed
- the challenges they presented, including the prescriptiveness of the evidence applicants have to provide – such as proof of income
We welcomed the consultation and the opportunity to address these complex issues, which have needed attention for some time. We agreed the Immigration Rules:
- must be clearer so that they’re fair to applicants and easily understood by them
- need to be reviewed and redrafted to make them the primary framework for all immigration applications
Clear, rational rules will help to create a system that's legally sound. Without this fundamental change, we're likely to see judicial intervention in the future.
What this means for solicitors
Simplifying the Immigration Rules will help solicitors advise their clients better around the immigration process and likely outcomes. The rules will:
- be fit for purpose
- improve access to the law
- be reliable guidance on immigration applications
March 2020 – the government responded to the Law Commission’s report
January 2020 – the Law Commission published its report on simplifying the rules, recommending they’re completely redrafted
April 2019 – we responded to the Law Commission’s consultation
During the consultation period, we:
- worked with the Immigration Law Committee, giving opinions on prescription, discretion and formatting, using real-life cases from our members
- communicated our members’ concerns and provided clear examples of where the complex rules have led to inconsistencies in applications which were rejected
- gave feedback on technological developments and the problems these can cause in applying the rules
Read the original consultation, the Law Commission’s report and the government’s response on the Law Commission website.