You are here:
  1. Home
  2. Policy campaigns
  3. Clinical negligence

Clinical negligence

31 July 2019

The government plans to introduce fixed recoverable costs for clinical negligence claims up to £25,000. Costs recovered for successful claims are currently, on average, over double the amount of compensation awarded for these lower value claims. Such cases make up around 60% of claims against the NHS. Fixing costs may reduce the financial impact on the NHS.

The government also plans to make the claims process quicker and reduce conflict.

The proposal

A Civil Justice Council working group is developing a new process to apply fixed recoverable costs to claims:

  • above £1,000 and below £25,000
  • in the fast track or the multi-track
  • against the NHS, not-for-profit and private healthcare providers in England and Wales

Small claims would not be affected. The government will consider the working group’s recommendations when they’re published.

The new process will be introduced through changes to the Civil Procedure Rules. Timescales have not been confirmed.

Our view

We support the government’s aim to improve patient care and reduce the cost of litigation. But we do not believe the current proposals are the best way to achieve this.

Fixed recoverable costs should only apply to simple claims and should not restrict a solicitor’s ability to work on low-value cases to the highest standard.

If fixed costs are introduced, the government must make sure:

  • victims of clinical negligence are able to get fair compensation for their injuries
  • solicitors can take on low-value cases without compromising professional standards
  • a process is agreed which includes challenging poor behaviour on both sides
  • exemptions are in place, for example if someone has died

We support:

  • the limit of £25,000 for cases covered by the scheme
  • exchanging evidence at an earlier, pre-action stage in low-value claims
  • a mandatory scheme
  • a working group to set out the new process

We oppose:

  • capping expert fees at £1,200: this could prevent high-quality evidence being collected
  • a single joint expert giving evidence for both parties: this could be unfair to one side

We suggest:

  • rules to ensure only suitable cases are included
  • government considers the risk of specialist medical negligence solicitors changing to a more profitable area, as they can reduce strain on the NHS – for example by discouraging weak claims

What this means for solicitors

Some complex low-value cases may no longer be viable or solicitors may have to settle for low amounts of compensation early on.

Solicitors will need to comply with any new processes set out in the Civil Procedure Rules.

What we’re doing

February 2018 – working group to scrutinise proposals

 
Show

 

 

July 2017 – recommendations that clinical negligence is considered separately

 
Show

 

  • We welcomed the Jackson review recommendations that clinical negligence claims are considered separately and fixed recoverable costs are capped at £25,000
  • Jackson review of civil litigation costs was published

 

April 2017 – response to DHSC consultation

 
Show

 

  • We responded to the DHSC consultation on fixed recoverable costs in lower value clinical negligence cases
  • We suggested fixed recoverable costs are only applied to simple claims so that solicitors’ high standards are not compromised

 

January 2017 – DHSC consults on fixed recoverable costs for clinical negligence

 
Show

August 2015 – response to DHSC pre-consultation

 
Show
  • We recommended that a fixed recoverable costs scheme might be appropriate for damages up to £25,000
    •  

    Get involved

    We continue to lobby government about fixed recoverable costs for medical negligence.

    Become clinical negligence accredited

    Our best practice quality mark shows your clients that you have proven expertise in clinical negligence.

    Recommended

    ommercial litigation conference 2019
    Commercial litigation conference 2019

    Litigators will gain expert insight from a high-calibre line up of judges, commercial litigators and barristers. Delegates will be given the opportunity to ask questions and join in debate from the floor

    Commercial litigation conference 2019 > More